Indexa helps legal research by giving advice, research, and supporting documents for the policy-making process. From baseline studies for the Sexual Violence Crime Act, to the Integrated Restorative Justice (IRJI) program with UNDP, to a national Cyber Security white paper and standard operational procedures for the Attorney General's Office — research backed by our in-house legal analytics.
Full-length Naskah Akademik with constitutional foundations, comparative-law analysis, criminalisation thresholds, and complete RUU drafts. Built around evidence, with a methodology that survives parliamentary scrutiny.
PP, Perpres, and Permen drafting — the secondary instruments that translate an Act into administrative practice. We bridge legislative intent and operational reality.
Attorney General Regulations, Pedoman, joint ministerial decisions, and SOPs. Designed to be readable by line prosecutors, investigators, and administrative officers — not just lawyers.
Evidence-based policy papers, gap analyses, and Regulatory Impact Assessments for ministries and international development partners. The work that informs whether a regulation should be drafted at all.
Indexa produced baseline information and conducted research across several variables as part of a baseline study for the Sexual Violence Crime Act — covering criminal offence, information regarding sexual violence, and the variables that a serious law needs to rest on.
The work included gap analysis across several areas for victim treatment and rehabilitation process — the kind of evidence base that turns an intention to legislate into a regulation that can actually be implemented and enforced.
It is a clear example of the house method: research first, evidence second, and only then the instrument — so that what ships is operable, not just aspirational.
Search legal information, regulation, and court decisions with one swipe. The profile's Pencari Informasi Putusan and Pencari Kesamaan Putusan — find a decision, then find every decision like it, and the regulation that connects them.
When we begin a research engagement, this is the first stop: which definitions of a term already exist, which higher and lower regulations cite the same provision, and what gaps and contradictions are already on the books.
An NLP and analytics platform that reads court decisions and writes back structured data — applied articles, sentence type, defendant attributes, geographic distribution — and finds correlation between each case and other cases and regulation.
When we conduct policy research, this is how we answer the question every lawmaker asks but rarely gets a quantitative answer to: what actually happens in court today. For the AGO narcotic requisitor work, 50,000 cases formed the baseline.
A classified graph of Supreme Court jurisprudence. Every kaidah hukum — the legal principle distilled from a decision — is tagged, clustered, and connected to related principles through a navigable tree.
For our drafters, this is the difference between citing a precedent and understanding its lineage: how a principle has been articulated across decades, where it has been narrowed, where it has been overturned, what other lines of reasoning sit alongside it.
Research outputs span document generation, policy briefs, and regulation generation — each grounded in survey, interview, and data analysis before a single line is drafted.
We start by mapping the existing regulatory landscape using our Legal Search Engine and Analytic platform: every related Act, PP, Perpres, Permen, and ministerial regulation already on the books. We surface contradictions, definitional drift, and gaps before research begins.
Indexa Analytic ingests case law and turns it into structured data. We answer questions like: how is this provision actually applied in court? What sentencing patterns exist? Where does the regulation produce unintended consequences?
Naskah Akademik: we research comparable regimes — Dutch schikking and strafbeschikking, restorative-justice models from Norway, NZ, and Indonesia's own constitutional foundations under Pasal 33 and MK jurisprudence.
Drafting in tight loops with the agency — legal bureau, technical directorates, and end-user units. We surface implementation risks early, before they become enforcement failures.
We don't stop at the gazette. Every primary instrument we draft is followed by the SOPs, technical guidelines, forms, and — where appropriate — the software that turns it into administrative practice.
We work with ministries, development partners, and CSOs on baseline studies, policy briefs, document generation, and regulation generation.
Gedung Setiabudi 2, Lantai 2, Suite 207 B-C
Jl. H. R. Rasuna Said Kav. 62
Kuningan, Jakarta